In a firm rebuttal to the Congress party’s claims of irregularities in the recently concluded Haryana Assembly elections, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has labeled the allegations as “baseless and misplaced.” The poll body issued a statement on Tuesday urging the Congress to refrain from making irresponsible claims that could sow distrust in the electoral process, especially during a critical phase when polling and counting are taking place.
The ECI emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of India’s electoral process, asserting that the Congress’s persistent questioning of the system reflects a troubling pattern. “The Commission categorically rejects all baseless allegations and apprehensions conveyed by the Indian National Congress (INC) regarding all aspects of the electoral process in the recently concluded election to the state assembly of Haryana,” the statement read.
A Pattern of Doubts
The ECI’s statement highlighted a concern over what it described as the Congress party’s “generic” doubts about electoral procedures. The Commission pointed out that such grievances are often raised without concrete evidence and coincide suspiciously with polling and counting days. “This has serious potential to fuel the surcharged environment,” the ECI cautioned, indicating that such unfounded claims could create unnecessary turmoil during a sensitive period in the democratic process.
In a detailed critique, the ECI referred to five specific instances from the previous year where similar allegations had been made by the Congress without any substantive proof. The Commission stressed the need for political parties, particularly those with extensive experience like the Congress, to exercise restraint and due diligence when questioning the electoral system.
Integrity of the Electoral Process
The ECI underscored its duty to protect the integrity of the electoral process, which is designed to be decentralized. It pointed out that grievances related to specific constituencies, such as electoral rolls, candidate deployment, and polling conduct, are typically addressed by local election officials like the Election Returning Officer (ERO) or District Election Officer (DEO). The Commission expressed its commitment to defending the statutory framework of Indian elections against what it termed “false narratives” propagated without evidence.
Moreover, the ECI referenced a compilation of 42 judgments from various Constitutional Courts that have examined the legitimacy of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), reinforcing public trust in the technology used in Indian elections.
Addressing EVM Concerns
The ECI directly addressed concerns raised by Congress leaders regarding the battery displays of EVMs during the counting process. Jairam Ramesh, Congress general secretary and Rajya Sabha MP, had alleged that the BJP was attempting to manipulate the election results, noting a perceived correlation between battery levels and electoral outcomes. He submitted a memorandum to the ECI, claiming that machines showing a 99 percent battery charge were linked to defeats for Congress candidates, while those with lower charges indicated victories for Congress.
In response, the ECI dismissed such suggestions as “preposterous.” The Commission clarified that the battery status displayed on the EVM Control Unit is solely for technical monitoring, ensuring smooth operation during polling, and has no bearing on the integrity of vote counting.
The ECI also took proactive steps to inform the public about EVM operations by publishing a comprehensive FAQ section on its website. This resource covers various aspects of EVM battery use, including the types of batteries used, the functionality of EVMs independent of operating voltage, and reasons why the power pack status may sometimes read as 99 percent after a full day of polling.
The Bigger Picture
The clash between the Congress party and the ECI highlights ongoing tensions in India’s electoral landscape, particularly regarding the use of technology in voting. As the political environment becomes increasingly charged, allegations and counter-allegations can have significant implications for public confidence in democratic institutions.
Political analysts suggest that such disputes are not uncommon during election cycles, especially as parties face the pressure of impending results. The ECI’s strong response may be an attempt to preemptively address concerns and maintain public trust in the electoral process.
The Congress party’s insistence on alleged irregularities is part of a broader narrative that questions the integrity of the electoral system, a narrative that the ECI aims to counteract through clear communication and a commitment to transparency.
Looking Ahead
As the political landscape in Haryana and beyond continues to evolve, the stakes remain high. With the counting of votes concluded and results expected to have significant implications for regional politics, both the ECI and the Congress party must navigate the aftermath of these elections with care. The ECI’s call for responsible dialogue and substantiated claims serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between political contestation and the sanctity of the electoral process.
In conclusion, while allegations of electoral irregularities are not new in Indian politics, the ECI’s firm stance against the Congress’s claims emphasizes the importance of evidence-based discourse in maintaining the integrity of democracy. As India heads towards further electoral contests, the focus will undoubtedly remain on the robustness of its electoral processes and the accountability of its political parties.
 has labeled the allegations as "baseless and misplaced."){kind=link}